Struggling to meet new CMS pain management billing rules? We’ll help you do it right — and get paid fast.
Pain Management Medical Billing Services
New payer requirements and prior authorization policies now impact pain management reimbursements more than ever. A single denied approval or missing documentation can cost up to 22% of potential revenue—and that’s before appeals.
Preferred MB offers pain management medical billing solutions built to meet the latest CMS rule changes, reduce denials, and move claims swiftly through the system.
- 18% Average Denial Reduction
- 98% First-Pass Clean Claim Accuracy
- < 20 Days in AR (Industry-Leading)
Stop Letting Pain Management Revenue Slip Through the Cracks
Denials in pain management billing don’t always show up loudly — they build quietly through modifier issues, missing pre-auth, or outdated LCD usage on common procedures like injections and nerve blocks.
Most billing teams move on too soon. But behind payer portals, claims keep aging, being downgraded, or silently denied, especially when global periods or opioid-related codes are involved.
Where Pain Revenue Gets Lost
- Prior authorizations fail due to unclear documentation or mismatched diagnosis-to-CPT links
- Bundled injection codes denied when modifier use isn't properly validated before submission
- High-dollar stimulator claims rejected for missing trial reports or incomplete supporting notes
- Soft denials never appealed due to unclear responsibility between billing and in-house teams
Preferred MB doesn’t just submit claims — we track and recover every dollar tied to pain care
Pain Billing Risks We Monitor
Our Specialized Services for Pain Practices
Pre-Authorization Handling
We manage and track prior authorizations, respond to payer requests, and follow up aggressively — so treatments aren’t delayed, and revenue isn’t stuck in limbo.
Accurate Pain-Specific Coding
Our certified coders know the nuances of pain management billing and coding, including image-guided injections, RFAs, and trial-to-implant stimulator coding requirements.
Denial Management & Appeals
We identify root causes of denials, prepare proper documentation, and appeal aggressively — with proven results in reducing AR aging and payment loss.
Payer Rules Monitoring
We stay ahead of changing payer edits, LCDs, and bundling logic to avoid common traps that cause medical necessity rejections or downcoded claims.
Charge Entry & Claim Scrubbing
Every claim goes through multi-layer scrubbing with specialty-specific rules, so your submissions are clean, accurate, and less likely to bounce back.
Payment Posting & Audit Trail
We post payments with complete payer mapping, reconcile with EOBs, and flag underpayments instantly — giving full transparency and clean financial records.
Analytics & Custom Reporting
You get real-time reports built around your KPIs — like denial rates, AR by payer, and reimbursement velocity — not just generic billing data.
Dedicated Account Management
You work with a pain billing specialist who knows your coding patterns, payers, and goals — not a rotating help desk or generic rep.
Coding Isn’t the Problem — Precision Is
Why Our Coding Workflow Wins
- Real-time coding mapped to payer-specific rules
- RFA, SI joint, and stim CPTs pre-scrubbed by intent
- Modifiers cross-checked with documentation tags pre-submission
- Every claim checked for LCD-linked medical necessity
- We flag vague diagnoses that risk downcoding
- Auto-checks for injection frequency by patient
- No copy-paste coding from old claims — ever
- Daily review of edits tied to pain CPTs
- Specialty-trained coders, not generalists or outsourced reps
- Built-in audit trail for every code line
Preferred MB doesn’t just avoid denials — we prevent them before your EHR even spits out a claim
s Your Coding Bleeding Revenue?
If you say “yes” to 2 or more, your billing team might be costing you thousands
Pain Billing by Subspecialty. Not One-Size-Fits-All
Clinical Scenario
- Trial performed under fluoroscopy with patient pain reduction documented
- Permanent implant with generator and lead insertion
- Post-op follow-up and remote setup recorded within EHR
Billing Scenario
- Remote monitoring added to EHR billing stream
- Modifier -58 used for staged trial-to-implant transition
- Pre-auth matched to final implant CPTs
Clinical Scenario
- Bilateral injections under fluoroscopy with contrast
- Pre/post pain scores and supervision noted
- Second-round scheduled based on treatment response
Billing Scenario
- CPT 64483 with fluoroscopy documented clearly
- Modifier -50 or RT/LT applied properly
- Repeat injections justified using diagnosis progression
Clinical Scenario
- Pre-RFA diagnostic block recorded with outcomes
- Ablation performed bilaterally with full notes
- Follow-up visit documented in clinic
Billing Scenario
- Modifier -50 applied for bilateral procedure
- Pre-auth linked to RFA service for approval
- No overlap with prior E/M billing
Clinical Scenario
- Multiple sites treated in single visit
- Diagnosis matched to ICD for muscle pain
- Follow-up visit scheduled and documented within global period timeline
Billing Scenario
- CPT 20553 for multiple groups clearly justified
- Modifier 79 added for post-oDocumentation supports modifier use Documentation supports modifier use if repeatedrepeatedp procedures unrelated to original service
- Denial risk reduced with LCD mapping
Clinical Scenario
- Fluoroscopy with contrast recorded
- Pain scale tracked before and after injection
- Conservative treatment documented in history
Billing Scenario
- Modifier -25 added for same-day E/M if applicable
- Bilateral coding applied based on fluoroscopy image
- EHR tags used to link scans and diagnosis
Our Work Across Pain Management Practice Models
Hospital-Affiliated Pain Management Groups
Independent Pain Clinics
Multispecialty Clinics Offering Pain Services
ASC-Based Interventional Suites
Practices After Audit or Billing Vendor Change

Built to Handle Every ENT Service Setting
- Verifies global-period overlaps tied to injections and RFAs
- Checks LCDs for coverage on spinal procedures
- Scrubs frequency edits for repeat epidurals
- Applies MUE logic for multi-level pain services
- Reviews documentation timelines against staged care protocols
97.6%
Pain management claims pass Medicare edits on first submission with full LCD mapping and MUE checks
- Separates imaging charges on guided injections per carrier rules
- Scrubs modifiers -59 and -25 by plan-specific denial history
- Detects claim edits on stimulator implants and trials
- Aligns CPT-to-NPI roles by payer expectation
52.2%
First-pass approval on image-guided injections and trials across major commercial pain payers
- Pre-validates medical necessity and prior auth thresholds
- Matches diagnosis support to plan-approved conditions
- Scrubs site-of-service conflicts with state logic
- Avoids claim suppression from missing rendering provider logic
94.1%
Claim approval rate for interventional pain services across 8+ state-based MCO programs
Focuses on injury-first logic and timelines
- Links every CPT to specific injury dates
- Scrubs for duplicate services across overlapping episodes
- Verifies claim sequence against treatment plan timeline
- Applies causality checks for approved procedure scope
91.7%
Clean claim rate for pain services under verified injury-based approvals with timeline mapping
What Happens When Pain Practices Switch to Preferred MB
Common Billing Failures → Solved by Preferred MB
🟥 Problem: Repeat RFAs denied with no warning
✅ Fix: Mapped RFA trials to correct pre-op logic and diagnosis chain
📈 Result: +19% approval jump on staged interventional claims
🟥 Problem: Epidural denials from LCD mismatch
✅ Fix: Applied local LCD rules per CPT and diagnosis before submission
📈 Result: 97.6% compliance with Medicare LCDs on injection claims
🟥 Problem: Stimulator trials denied due to pre-auth gaps
✅ Fix: Triggered CPT-specific auth logic before coding
📈 Result: <1 denied trial per month across all payers
🟥 Problem: Place-of-service mismatches in ASC billing
✅ Fix: Separated technical/professional billing using verified POS coding logic
📈 Result: 92% clean claim rate in ASC + clinic locations
🟥 Problem: Revenue missing from unbilled image guidance
✅ Fix: Linked fluoroscopy and imaging modifiers to every guided injection
📈 Result: $800–$1200/month recovered per provider